![]() Was Darwin Wrong? |
Home | Intro | About | Feedback | Prev | Next |
|
a review by Gert Korthof
8 Feb 1999
"One outcome from all this is that scientists now spend more time
than they did before,
thinking about the nature of science,
its strengths and limitations"
![]() For every book there is a short and balanced characterisation, just enough to decide: read/not read. If any book belongs to the category 'Both Sides of the Controversy', then it is this one. Of course a printed bibliography cannot be kept up to date. No works after 1996 are included. One needs online Internet resources to keep up to date. A major omission is Douglas Futuyma's defence of evolution against creationist attacks: Science on Trial. The Case for Evolution (1995). Douglas Futuyma is the author of a widely used college textbook on evolution: Evolutionary Biology and has been editor of Evolution, the leading international journal of evolutionary research. Further omissions are the theist David Foster (1993): The Philosophical Scientists, the neo-Darwinist and anti-creationist George C. Williams (1996): Plan & Purpose in Nature and the theist Langdon Gilkey (1985) Maker of Heaven and Earth. The Christian Doctrine of Creation in the Light of Modern Knowledge. A minor error: Paul Davies is in the book, but not in the index. Conclusion: Hayward produced a very useful guide to the literature. Further Reading
|
|
Korthof blogspot | home: wasdarwinwrong.com | wasdarwinwrong.com/kortho38.htm |
Copyright © 1999 G.Korthof . | First published: Feb 01 1999 | updated: Feb 08 1999 |