|Home | Intro | About | Feedback | Prev | Next||
review by Gert Korthof
28 Mar 1998 (updated 19 Aug 2003)
"In this book I propose to show that the answer to
(1) 'Is Darwin the founder of the theory of evolution ?'
(2) 'Does his theory of natural selection give an acceptable explanation
of the mechanism of evolution ?' is in both instances 'no'.
And if I am right, we obviously end up in a rather awkward situation as
far as present-day biology is concerned."
"I do not know when I first began to suspect that there is something questionable in the state of current evolutionary thought, but I know who aroused my suspicions - Karl Ernst von Baer and Richard B. Goldschmidt, and it is because I am an embryologist that their teachings had this effect."
"I came to understand that in the last century, hardly anybody, not even Darwin himself, believed that natural selection can accomplish all the events necessary for the occurrence of organic evolution."
"I discovered that the history of evolutionary thought, as it is told today, contains a large number of mistakes and misrepresentations - to express it fairly mildly - all of them aimed at adulating Darwin and debunking his opponents."
"I present an alternative theory of evolution, which stands up to the problems which have remained unsolved by Darwinism. At this stage, when, in my opinion, the Darwinian myth has been refuted, it may be appropriate to scrutinise it and try to understand why it arose in the first place."
Which myth is refuted?
The theory of evolution is a myth? Darwinism a myth? Neo-Darwinism a myth?
A myth is a story that many people believe, but which is not true.
Exactly what story is false? The whole evolution-story? Everything what
has been written by Darwin and the Darwinists?
Is it possible to reject part of evolution or Darwinism and accept the remainder?
What are his motives? Creationists talk about "Shattering the Myths of Darwinism";
Is Lövtrup a creationist?
Contrary to what the title Darwinism: The Refutation of a Myth suggests,
Sören Lövtrup is neither a creationist nor an outsider.
He is a professional biologist specialising in Systematics and Developmental Biology.
He wrote textbooks in those fields. He is quoted by professional biologists.
All this makes this book very unusual.|
In the first place he makes clear distinctions. And that is what I like about this author. He distinguishes between:
"Indeed, the nature and the wealth of the corroborating evidence are such that the theory on the reality of evolution turns out to be one of the best substantiated theories in biology, perhaps in the natural sciences."At the same time he denies that Darwin's theory of natural selection gives an acceptable explanation of the mechanism of evolution. Since he accepts the fact of evolution and wants to argue about the mechanisms of evolution, he is not as radical as the title of his book suggests. An implication of accepting the reality of evolution is that it pushes him in a particular position regarding the truth of the theory of evolution: the reality of evolution is not dependent on the answers to (2) and (3). In other words: from the reality of evolution follows that all living beings must be genetically related ('common descent') and it imposes a particular order of appearances in the history of life. He notes these implications, but he does not see them as problematic. For example if we cannot possibly find a mechanism for the origin of an organism or structure: does it invalidate the 'fact of evolution' or does it mean we have to wait for future scientific progress?
For Lovtrup problems in the mechanisms of evolution do not falsify the existence of evolution.
The author makes again a valuable distinction in the theory of mechanisms of evolution:
Lovtrup's answer to the question 'Is Darwin the founder of the theory of evolution?' is 'NO',
but it is a historical question, a question of priority. He means that 'evolution'
was Lamarck's theory, not Darwin's theory (4).
In my opinion the more important question is:
'Is the Lamarckian theory of evolution true?'. I doubt Lovtrup could give a positive answer.
Especially noteworthy is his attempt to do justice to Mivart, and his description of how Darwin
and his friends reacted to Mivart's criticism of Darwin. It is part of his chapter 'The Critics'
in which he discusses Jenkin, Mivart, and Butler. Mivart was excommunicated from the scientific
Establishment and later from the Catholic Church.
In discussing the critics it appears that Lovtrup is defending macro-mutations, and he rejects micro-mutations as the sole mechanism of evolution (p261,274). Indeed on p369 we find:
"It thus appears that all the objections against the macromutation theory may easily be met, and this is in itself perhaps the most compelling evidence in its favour."
This book deserves further study.
|guestbook (moderated)||home: wasdarwinwrong.com||wasdarwinwrong.com/kortho28.htm|
|Copyright © 1998 G.Korthof||First published: 26 Mar 1998||Last update: 19 Aug 2003|